Our response to the Justice Department’s recent opposition to affirmative action and diversity in higher education featured in the Boston Globe:
If Jeff Sessions believes in so-called states’ rights, he can start by respecting states’ efforts to promote diversity in their own colleges. That’s what the Supreme Court did again last term for the University of Texas, but it’s the opposite of a Trump administration initiative to dismantle affirmative action. If the administration decides to put Harvard University in its crosshairs first, it will have a losing fight on its hands.
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, a suit prepared by the same group behind both unsuccessful challenges in Texas, alleges that Asian-Americans are being discriminated against in Harvard admissions. But research shows that any so-called Asian penalty is caused by white admissions advantage and not affirmative action.
Moreover, our clients, a multiracial group of current and prospective Harvard students, including Asian-Americans, who serve as amici in the case, value Harvard’s ability to ensure a diverse student body. They have no interest in serving as a wedge to promote a nativist agenda, and nor should the Justice Department.
Education Project Director
Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Justice
Nicole Gon Ochi
Supervising Attorney, Impact Litigation
Asian Americans Advancing Justice